Once again, we find ourselves in the curious position of having our culture examined by experts who seem to wear blinders, whether or not they’re aware of it. Enter Steven Greenblatt, one of the top Shakespeare critics of our time. A notable figure with a knack for keeping readers entertained with his impressive knowledge and engaging prose, Greenblatt has been criticized for his secular approach. Now, this wouldn’t be a problem if he were writing about the latest techno-gadget or an automobile review, but in understanding Shakespeare, it becomes a bit of a hurdle.
It’s like asking a fish to describe the desert. Sure, they can imagine vastness, dryness, possibly some cacti, but the core essence? It’s missing. When Greenblatt analyzes Shakespeare, something is lost in translation. He looks at the Bard’s work through a secular lens, which, for a playwright steeped in the nuances of faith and morality, seems akin to bringing a spoon to a knife fight. In his view, Shakespeare’s world might be approached from a secular perspective. However, the depth and complexities of Shakespeare’s writings propose otherwise, often interwoven with themes of sin and redemption.
Consider the grand parade of Shakespeare’s characters and narratives—Macbeth, Hamlet, and even the whimsical spirits of “A Midsummer Night’s Dream.” These are tales filled to the brim with morality plays, ghostly encounters, and existential dilemmas that carve deep into the human conscience. This is storytelling with all the charms and challenges of grappling with the great celestial questions. Without acknowledging the potent spiritual undercurrents, one might mistakenly interpret these vivid sagas as mere human folly, stripped of their richer ethical queries.
There have been debates about Shakespeare possibly harboring secret Catholic sympathies during a time in England when such a belief could lead to dire consequences. This was a world where religion wasn’t just an add-on to one’s identity but often the very backbone of existence. Critics who sideline this Christian context can quickly find themselves adrift, missing the heartbeat of the narratives. It’s not about pigeon-holing Shakespeare into a religious box; it’s about understanding that his work exists within a tapestry of belief systems that profoundly influenced his writing.
Yet, it serves as a reminder of the broader issue at play. When the realm of interpretation is limited by personal biases, whether secular or spiritual, the richness of the art gets bleached. Understanding art—or anything of cultural significance—from only one viewpoint is like reading a book with one eye closed. You might get the gist, but you’ll miss the magic. And let’s be honest, in a world where texts full of skulls, fifties, and tortured princes still captivate audiences, isn’t the delight in diving headfirst into that magic?