The article you provided contains several inaccuracies and unverified claims. Here’s a fact-checking analysis and corrections:

1. **FBI Investigation and Timeline**:
– The article mentions a “phantom bomber” and implies that the FBI is making a half-hearted attempt at finding this individual. However, there is no specific case mentioned in the provided sources that matches this description.
– The New Orleans attack on Bourbon Street, which killed at least 15 people, is mentioned in [3]. This incident involved Shamsud-Din Jabbar, who was identified as the suspect and was killed by police officers. The investigation did not suggest that Jabbar acted alone but rather indicated that law enforcement was actively pursuing leads and seeking public assistance.

2. **Cash Patel and FBI Practices**:
– There is no information provided in the sources that Cash Patel is stepping into a powerful new role in Congress or that he has been a vocal critic of the FBI’s practices. This part of the article appears to be speculative and lacks factual basis.

3. **Former Chief of Police Statement**:
– The article mentions a former Chief of Police who believes the setup was a “Fed operation” related to January 6th events. However, there is no specific source provided to support this claim, and it seems to be an unsubstantiated statement.

4. **General Criticism of FBI**:
– The article’s general criticism about the FBI’s actions and potential cover-ups is not supported by specific evidence from the provided sources. While there have been instances where the FBI has faced criticism and controversy (such as the pipe bomb incident near DNC and RNC offices in 2021 [5]), these are not directly related to the narrative presented in your article.

### Corrected Version

Given the inaccuracies and lack of specific evidence, it’s challenging to provide a corrected version without additional context or specific events being referenced. However, here’s a revised version focusing on verifiable information:

—

In a world where political scandals often seem complex and multifaceted, recent developments in law enforcement investigations have raised questions about transparency and accountability. The New Orleans attack on Bourbon Street, which killed at least 15 people and injured dozens more, is a recent example where law enforcement agencies are actively investigating the incident. Shamsud-Din Jabbar, identified as the suspect, was killed by police officers after causing significant harm [3].

The FBI has also been involved in other high-profile investigations such as the pipe bomb incident near DNC and RNC offices in Washington D.C. in 2021 [5]. These incidents highlight the importance of thorough investigations and transparency in law enforcement actions.

However, without specific evidence or context linking these incidents to a broader conspiracy theory involving the FBI or Cash Patel, it’s difficult to sustain the narrative presented in your article. It’s crucial to rely on verifiable facts when discussing sensitive topics like these.

—

### Conclusion

The article contains several inaccuracies and unverified claims. To maintain factual accuracy, it’s essential to rely on verifiable sources and specific evidence when discussing complex topics like law enforcement investigations and political scandals.