There’s a professor over at Georgetown University named Jonathan Franklin, and let’s just say he’s making waves in the world of academia—mostly because people can’t believe he’s somehow a teacher. Now, one might think that a professor would possess a certain level of wisdom or, at the very least, the ability to articulate thoughts without sounding like an off-brand talk show host who just downed a Red Bull. But Franklin’s latest antics have left many scratching their heads and wondering if higher education really has taken a turn for the bizarre.

In a recent episode of “What Were They Thinking?” Franklin found himself in a situation all too familiar for today’s comedians: he went on a meaningless rant about white people—and not in the educational, “let’s-bridge-the-gap” sort of way. Oh no. It was more of a, “Hey, let’s throw some shade while we’re at it!” sort of talk, where he alluded to his colleagues being a “bunch of sticker white.” Now, what exactly does that mean? It sounds less like a critique and more like someone trying to figure out just how many shades of white exist in a crayon box. Good luck getting that PhD, Dr. Franklin!

But here’s where it gets even more interesting. Enter the so-called “sellouts” of the conservative world. People like Candace Owens and James O’Keefe pop up in conversations, and frankly, it feels like every time they’re mentioned, a conservative gets a little bit of a shiver. It’s like discussing one’s favorite pizza toppings, only to find out your friend likes pineapple. Can we all agree that sometimes it’s better to steer clear of those conversations, especially if you’re trying not to lose your appetite for political discourse?

Now, let’s not forget the entertainment value here. This whole unhinged discussion paints a vivid picture: picture a raccoon diving into a trash can—half confused, half hungry, and entirely unapologetic. That seems rather appropriate to describe Franklin’s approach to academia. And while the jokes may land like a feather falling from a great height, there’s a heavy implication behind them. When professors start dabbling in such divisive and frankly nonsensical banter, it makes you question the quality of what the next generation is being taught. Seriously, are we preparing young minds for critical thinking, or are they just signing up for Comedy 101?

Of course, there’s a fine line between humor and insanity, and somewhere along the way, Franklin has managed to sprint across it like a sprinter on a caffeine binge. While he aims for incisive commentary, what he delivers is more akin to a poorly executed one-liner at an amateur night comedy show. And the sad part? We’re all front-row spectators, and it’s hard not to cringe while simultaneously chuckling at the absurdity unfolding in what’s supposed to be a place of learning.

So here’s the takeaway, folks: the world of academia can, at times, feel like a circus—complete with clowns, acrobats, and masterful juggles of logic that leave the audience wondering if they should be laughing or crying. With educators like Franklin, who can blame anyone for finding it tough to separate serious discussion from slapstick humor? Next time you enter a classroom, just remember: the laughter may very well be an attempt to keep the pain of comprehension at bay. After all, in a world where political commentary often sounds like comedy, perhaps the true jest lies in how seriously we take it all.